Lenny's Newsletter · Product & Work
TIER 4 2022-01-04
Q: I find most of the prioritization frameworks are for larger companies with an established set of features. Apart from user feedback, research, and my gut, I’d love to understand if there is a framework you’ve seen work at early-stage companies trying to hit product-market fit. For context, I’m a first-time founder building in the B2B space.
You’re absolutely right. Most of the prioritizing advice out there is not actually useful for early-stage pre-PMF companies. Including my earlier post on prioritization. That’s troubling, because bad prioritization is an excellent way to kill your startup.
A startup is like a newly lit fire: exciting but fragile. Make a few wrong moves, and it ceases to be.

Prioritizing at a large company is different. You’ve got momentum and fuel, and prioritizing is more about accelerating something that’s already working vs. creating something new. As a result, you have a lot more room for error.

While I was at Airbnb, I’m pretty sure the majority of our experiments had zero (or negative) impact. But we continued to grow because we had strong PMF, a word-of-mouth flywheel, and a growing market, and we found enough big wins to make up for many mistakes. You have none of these advantages at an early-stage startup.
Let’s take a closer look at prioritizing at a pre-PMF startup—specifically a B2B startup. Below, I’ll share:
To inform my thinking, I asked some of my favorite early-stage founders (building rocket-ship businesses) how they prioritized early-on. You’ll find their insights below. A big thank-you to Benjamin Encz (CEO of Ashby), Christina Cacioppo (CEO of Vanta), Julianna Lamb (CTO of Stytch), May Habib (CEO of Writer), Rujul Zaparde (CEO of Zip), and Tommy Dang (CEO of Mage).
Let’s do this.
“We have a philosophy when it comes to building product that we shouldn’t just build either what competitors are doing or take at face value what customers are asking for. Rather, we dig deeper to understand the problem they’re trying to solve and what the optimal solution could be. Maybe someone thinks that x is a solution to problem y—but if you just build x without understanding problem y, you often shortchange yourself. There’s actually a more elegant or better solution to problem y that you’ll only find if you understand the root issue first. Sometimes we even find that the product already supports what someone is trying to do. This helps us build more universally applicable products vs. one-off solutions.”
—Julianna Lamb, CTO of Stytch
Broadly, your single goal as an early-stage pre-PMF startup should be to make 10 customers very happy. Everything you prioritize should be in service of this goal.
Why 10? If you can make 10 customers very happy, you can probably make 100 customers very happy. From there, you can continue to add value, reduce friction, build your growth engine, etc. On the flip side, if you cannot make 10 customers very happy, it’s unlikely you have a business.
Why very happy? Because there are endless products fighting for your customers’ attention. The bar for people continuing to come back to (and pay for) your product is much higher than you think. When you’ve solved a real problem, people will beg you to take their money.

What does very happy look like? “Very happy”is just another way to describe product-market fit. Here’s what PMF looks like and feels like. Once you have data, look at your cohort retention numbers.
SUSS it out: Segment, Understand, Solve, and Stay focused.

“We had a folder where we put all of our power-user video calls. When we were coming up with how to articulate the core value proposition (which became ‘AI writing assistant for teams’), I would re-listen to them over and over, hand-write out the exact clutch quotes, and try to connect the dots between different types of users who were really happy with our product. It helped me really internalize why people found the early product so useful, and we, very critically, could relay that back to engineering and to the market to acquire more users.”
—May Habib, CEO of Writer
“We’d revisit our customer pitch and investor pitch (in a simple Google Doc) on a weekly basis and modify it as our understanding of the problem/solution evolved. We then wrote out what we believed to be the core problems Zip solves, logged every single request that any prospect or customer had, and then mapped each one to the list of problems to decide whether we should build or skip.”
—Rujul Zaparde, CEO of Zip
You’ll never find a magical prioritization framework that tells you exactly what to build. Instead, embrace the messy. Prioritize work that will bring you closer to 10 very happy users, across these three buckets:
Increase the value of your product (~80% of your time): Put most of your resources into reducing your users’ pain, saving them time, and helping them do better work. Look for:
Blockers: What’s keeping your users from quickly accomplishing the task they want to accomplish?
“We generally prioritize any serious ‘blockers’ with existing features over new feature development. Beyond that, we take a portfolio approach of allocating a certain percentage of the team to building new features (i.e. making the product stickier), over optimizing existing features.”
—Benjamin Encz, CEO of Ashby
“When it was just us two founders, I spent much of my time fixing bugs that early users wrote in about. Those got fixed as quickly as I could fix them (though I also introduced some 😬). As soon as the team was four engineers, we had a rotating ‘support on call’ role, where three engineers were working through the roadmap and one was just fixing bugs/issues that came in from support tickets. That was really helpful in the early days, as it (1) ensured we were prioritizing small user delight-ish things and (2) showed early users that we were responsive and cared, which I think/hope encouraged them to send more feedback.”
—Christina Cacioppo, CEO of Vanta
You’re at a huge advantage if you’re building a product that you yourself need or wish you had. If that’s the case, then your best initial ideas will come from you and your founding team. Pay attention to these ideas.
“We’d prioritize the features we wish we had when using existing ML tools. That was our base roadmap—build features that could’ve made our jobs easier back then. Until we got our product in the hands of real paying customers, we kept building things we needed as users of our own product.”
—Tommy Dang, CEO of Mage
Outside of that, the best ideas will come from conversations with your early users (and potential users). When talking to them, look for:
Check out this post for more ideas.
To close: remember, you are building something that has never existed before. It’s hard. There is no magical framework that will tell you what to build. And even if you prioritize perfectly, there’s no guarantee you’ll build something people will want, or a business that will last. But prioritizing smartly, and laser-focusing on making 10 (and later, many more) customers very happy, will give you a fighting chance at building a roaring business. Good luck!

Have a fulfilling and productive week 🙏
Browse more open roles, or add your own, at Lenny’s Job Board.
Legend • Great • Good • OK • Meh
If you’re finding this newsletter valuable, consider sharing it with friends, or subscribing if you haven’t already.
Sincerely,
Lenny 👋