Here Deming turns the lens on the institutions that supposedly certify merit — Harvard above all — and on the meritocratic logic that justifies them. A columnist argues that meritocracy and magnanimity cannot coexist and proposes blowing up selective admissions in favor of a lottery and far larger enrollment; a former bank CEO argues against purely commercial, skip-college education and faults Harvard for failing to make its case to the public as an American institution. Both pieces sit at the intersection of education economics and the legitimacy crisis facing elite higher ed, the terrain Deming knows from the inside.
TIER 4
Jun 3, 2026
NYT columnist Ross Douthat makes a layered case that belief in God is more reasonable now than a century ago (fine-tuning, the multiverse, consciousness as a supernatural experience), and argues meritocracy and magnanimity cannot coexist. He critiques Harvard's careerist monoculture, proposes admission by lottery plus far larger enrollment, and revisits the Grand New Party diagnosis of downscale conservative voters that predicted the coalition but missed the policy.
religionmeritocracyelite admissionspolitical realignmentAI and consciousness
TIER 4
Jun 10, 2026
Former Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein argues that post-2008 reforms spread capital and risk more evenly and outside regulators' reach, so a "law of conservation of risk" makes small crises (e.g. SVB 2023) more manageable but a large systemic crisis far worse, because the 2008 coordination of banks and government is now nearly impossible. He also makes a pointed case against purely commercial education (the Thiel Fellowship test) and argues Harvard has failed to make its case to the public as an American institution.
financial crisissystemic riskGoldman Sachsliberal arts educationHarvard